This page contains notes on things that need to be done in the wiki and lists of pages that need work (wanted, rough, stub and orphans.)

• Work more keywords into front page: human nature, etc.
• SEO “positive self regard”
• Fix up “The Human Story”
• All the front-page and level map links should be not only not broken, but also to solid content.
  • economics:0main, split off sustainability, better overview. Ref Luxury Fever.
  • Add a bunch of stubs
  • evidence and themes story pages
• gene-culture coevolution on front page.
• Add some reflections. play_twenty_questions with your unconscious
• Work link to style into first paragraph on main page, SEO “limited consensus” “The brain is a hack”?
• books “virtual reading group” aim new users
• can use “Shiva and Parvati”, Starfish monolog? story:spirit, wiki:user:ram Also old essays. Move all old homepage content to wiki, set up forwarding, SEO.
• web search for more links and evidence, especially media
• check TED
• Announce various places
• See if I can link-exchange with some related sites.
• Investigate other searches. “Humanist economics”? May be necessary to add more content to back this up. “coevolution” is a nice term.
• Mind add links to other interesting pages, maybe factor some of current content.

• Sex Differences, Individual Differences and Fairness, Nature Versus Nurture. Deprecate politics, emphasize worldview, story. To say that the view is politically motivated is somewhat backwards. The question is the nature of and the prospects for human improvement.
• Story
• Expand Evolutionary Psychology to explain theory behind the obsession with sex, deception, etc.
• evolutionary adaptation vs. behavioral flexibility, behavior drives evolution (and vice-versa.) Cyclic causation/coevolution.
• material from powerpoint presentation

• concept namespace. hack, a-life, connectionist, optimization, rule-based, etc.
• people:william_james
• in group/out group
• contingency. Tree Anolis may be inevitable, but was some for of intelligent culturally-evolving life inevitable?
• revise Gut Feelings review. Push up into author page or analysis?
• is worldview a good term, and how does this relate to belief?
• Move art pages into wiki.
• Move mail electro messages into electro wiki.
• cyclic vs. linear time
• intentional opacity and conscious/unconscious struggle.
• illusion “X is an illusion”, naive.
• purpose Link Teleology, discuss purpose in evolution.

• every namespace needs a 0main page
• process Discussion of page type (review or content) and the level structure of the wiki (story:analysis:review). limited consensus, academic fields, in-group
• add tags to papers
• Add namespace template for new users, papers
• In style, use of quotes, e.g. “bias” vs. bias, Avoid claims of motivated belief

Later:

• top level art {music, visual} namespaces
• art:gallery:<user>
• analysis:mind:emotion namespace
• Link to wiki:tags below front page tagcloud. (redundant if tags are in index.)

• Tag cloud seems chronically messed-up
• Change to different template?
• Bigger followed link color contrast.
• Check mark for followed, esp. in index?
• Underlining looks kind of bad lots of places. Only do in main body? Not in tables, index, etc.
• images are getting underlined.
• Update level_map image map regions to include entire box, be centered, etc. Add “mind” label and link to Mind. Link to level_map page.
• Clicking anywhere on the map raises the main window.
• Switch pagename/backlinks and home link in banner
• Try toolbox again. Need “show page”. Maybe keep only bottom toolbar?
• ~~DISCUSSION:off~~ to tag pages
• User personal area. variable plugin? alias plugin namespace template?
• headings should not be justified.
• Server switchover: on ram.mrtc: logwatch, smartd?
• Fix DL style indent
• Graphic logo, eg. favicon.
• header photos
• Don't justify section titles.

Later:

• Look at different tree index browser plugins.
• Make tag cloud on front page prettier by template hookin.

Pages that need work are classified in four categories of decreasing priority: wanted, rough, stub and orphan.

These pages are referenced but don't exist. Click on a red broken link to create that page. If the link should really be to another page then click “Show backlinks” to find the pages with the bad links so that they can be changed.

These pages really need to be fixed. Either they don't follow the Style guidelines or are important topics that are currently so incomplete or unbalanced that they don't convey the needed message or serve the intended organizational function.

These pages would benefit from being expanded, but do follow the Style guidelines and do refer to related internal pages or other sources such as Wikipedia.

These pages exist but aren't linked to anywhere. This isn't necessarily a problem, but does suggest that either the topic is irrelevant or should be referenced somewhere.