====== Level Confusion ======

Level confusion is confused thinking that arises from examining a system at different [[analysis:concept:levels]] without realizing that you are doing so or what the implications might be.  Here are some common areas of level confusion:
  * Mind vs. Body and reality: the [[analysis:mind:x_proved_real]] fallacy.  "I can imagine whatever I want, so my thoughts aren't real, but brain scanners can tell what I'm thinking by real changes in my brain.  It's all so confusing..."
  * [[determinism_vs_free_will]] and moral responsibility.  It is an intuitively appealing argument that if mind arises from a deterministic physical process, then there is no free will, and no moral responsibility.  "If my behavior is determined, then I should stop worrying about making decisions because I don't have any choice, and I can do whatever I want without taking any responsibility, but then I must have been destined to believe in determinism, and if I were destined to believe in free will, would my responsibility be different?  It's all so confusing..."
  * Subjective perception vs. the physical world and [[analysis:mind:naive_realism]].  "I just crashed into a car that wasn't there when I looked before, but it must have been there because I crashed into it.  It's all so confusing..."

====== Sources of Level Confusion ======

Clearly this thinking //is// confused, and something must be wrong here.  Confusion can result from the failure to understand that:

  ; //The map is not the territory!//
  : ([[analysis:philosophy:reality]] vs. [[analysis:concept:representation]] and [[analysis:mind:0main | hardware vs. signal]]) The brain is real and we can make factual statements about its functioning, but this tells us nothing about whether thoughts are true or real, or whether there is free will.   Yet we //must// use abstraction (maps and categories) because the world has such a wealth of irrelevant particular details, most of which require considerable patience and sophisticated measurement merely to observe them.
  ; //More is different!//
  : Because of [[analysis:physical:emergence]] simple thought experiments with commonsense interpretations can lead us far astray.  Reality and the brain are not simple.  Any system that consists of a huge number of complexly interacting parts can behave in unpredictable novel ways. 
  ; //You don't know what you think!//
  : The nature of [[analysis:mind:consciousness]] depends on both [[analysis:concept:representation]] and [[analysis:physical:emergence]], but the design of our minds is evolutionary, proceeding by incremental modifications from an existing plan, and [[analysis:concept:optimization | optimized]] to generate [[analysis:evolution:adaptive]].  For [[analysis:social:cultural_animal]] it became necessary to understand ourselves to some degree, but it wasn't necessary (or even desirable) for our self-understanding to be entirely accurate, so it //isn't//. See [[analysis:mind:intentional_opacity | Intentional]] and [[analysis:mind:representational_opacity | Representational]] opacity and [[analysis:mind:user_interface_analogy]].


====== Catataxis ======


Catataxis is a name for level confusion coined by John Brodie Donald (see [[:books:catataxis|Catataxis]].) He offers these observations about [[:analysis:concept:levels#emergent_levels| emergent levels]] and their associated analytic levels:


  - Virtue reverses at a catataxic boundary: Another way of saying this is that what is good for the individual may be bad for the collective (and vice versa). [See [[:analysis:philosophy:evolutionary_ethics|Evolutionary Ethics]]]
  - Conflict below creates stability above: The more disagreement there is on one level, the more likely there is to be calm and stability on the level above. This is best summed up in the saying “still waters run deep“. A calm surface often masks a roiling torrent underneath. A stock market is a good example of this.
  - In the end, quantitative change becomes qualitative change: This is a more sophisticated way of saying more of the same is different. [See [[:analysis:physical:emergence|Emergence]]]
  - Today's groups are tomorrow's individuals: over time, things tend to get bigger and clump together. The river of history is a grouping vector. [See [[:analysis:evolution:meta_evolution|Meta-Evolution]]]
  - Categorization destroys information: Once the scale increases, the only way a human brain can function is by categorizing things. [See [[:analysis:concept:levels|Levels]], [[:analysis:concept:modularity|Modularity]]]

====== What to Do? ======

While confusion can easily result from crossing levels without noticing it, we don't say that it is always a mistake crossing levels.  What takes place at those boundaries is often quite interesting, both practically and theoretically:
  * Interactions between individuals and social groups ([[analysis/concept/levels#emergent_levels |emergent levels]]) are particularly important to humans.  Mismatched interests create [[analysis:social:social_conflict#individualgroup_conflict | individual/group conflict]], and our [[analysis:philosophy:evolutionary_ethics |moral sense]] has evolved as a response to this conflict.  
  * The relationship between the physical world, our perceptions, and our conscious thoughts has fascinated humans ever since we //were// conscious.  (see [[mind_body_dualism]], [[analysis:level_map]]).
  * The brute physical world is often very predictable: what goes up must come down, and so on.  In contrast, living things, and especially people, are quite unpredictable.  This is a big reason why [[analysis:philosophy:mind_body_dualism]] is so intuitively appealing, and why [[determinism_vs_free_will | determinism seems inconsistent with free will]].
  * Crossing the [[analysis/concept/levels#analytic_levels | analytic levels]] between sciences is often highly productive, and is the entire foundation of this Wiki.

{{tag>representation reality philosophy emergence}}